Rustbucket350
Veteran Member
I think they did wonder. Otherwise they wouldn't have put it in their flagship car. I wasn't necessarily asking which design was making more power, I was, and am, wondering which would have more power and the same longevity. For myself. Considering each design stresses different components. Also, the trade offs with the power curve are another thing I'm interested in.Well, GM did not "wonder" about some of the advantages, hence why they did not design a "long" stroke/low rpm engine for the new C8 - z06. They actually went with the "over-squared" architecture for many good reasons.
With a 4.100 bore x 3.15 stroke, light weight/cross plane crank, light/long rods, light pistons with thin metric rings, "Tunnel ram" length tuned runners, dry sump and solid valve train.....all in a 333 cube package, see a trend LOL.
Hitting 2hp per cube and 1.38 tq per cube in a N/A pump gas application is something, the 2,100 rpm peak spread with that geared multi speed trans is so sweet. I drove a C8's, but not the Z06.
If I could shove a 8 spd paddle DCA in my Camaro I would LOL,, but I would lose that "feel" of the manual, but it would be awesome on the road course I bet.......
I am not concerned with whether or not an oppositely built engine can make the same power. I know it can. I want to know why.
Last edited: