T56 doesn't fit in transmission tunnel of 79 Z28 - help!

Discussion in 'Transmission & Driveline Topics' started by Crosby, Oct 7, 2016.

  1. Crosby

    Crosby 1973 Camaro RS Lifetime Gold Member

    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2001
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    My son and I are putting a T56 six speed in his 79 Z28, with a GEN I SBC via a special flywheel. He has the external slave (push?) style bellhousing, etc. and we just can't get the transmission to fit in under the tunnel. A year or two ago we rebuilt his engine and replaced his clutch, and had a hell of a time getting the stock Super T10 out. We had to unbolt it from the bellhousing and even then, it was very difficult - clearance was super tight. This car has had frame connectors installed, and I am wondering if something as simple as worn/crushed/squished subframe bushings could be causing the engine to be sitting too high? I think a bunch of people have swapped in T56s, although maybe not with the SBC? I really can't see cutting the tunnel, that would be so dramatic and might affect the structural integrity of that area. I know people have had to cut and or elongage the shifter hole, but this of course is completely different. Thanks so much for any guidance or direction.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. black_aerocoupe

    black_aerocoupe Veteran Member

    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    19
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Location:
    McD's @ the Pavillions, AZ
    There is no shorter T56 bellhousing than the 93-97 unit you're using. So that's to your benefit.

    Worn frame/body bushings affect T56 fit on the full-frame cars and the stub-frame F-bodies too; address that next.
     
  3. XxWickedz28xX

    XxWickedz28xX Veteran Member Lifetime Gold Member

    Messages:
    5,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Carmel, NY
    I had to cut the tranny tunnel when i had the t56 installed into my 79z. Im also using a old school sbc with the t56.

    It really wasnt that big a deal, no structural problems 4 years later.
     
  4. 72BIGBLOCK

    72BIGBLOCK Veteran Member

    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    149
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Location:
    SF
    I pressed mine in with the jack slowly
    Then We opened up the opening for the shifter
    The console had to be pushed back
    Drove it today and no issues so far no vibrations either
    Oh but my cars a 69 camaro
     
  5. 408maro

    408maro Veteran Member

    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Location:
    San jose,CA
    i think these later 2nd gens are a little different then the early 2nd gens, but i have a SBC with a 93-97 f-body LT1 and did not
    have to cut or massage anything besides the hole for the shifter.

    fits pretty good.

    i am using solid body bushings and factory style engine mounts
     
  6. 79ZED

    79ZED Veteran Member

    Messages:
    3,093
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2000
    Location:
    Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
    Crosby,

    I'm not sure about a SBC / LT1-T56 combo, but with my BBC/LT1-T56 combo I had to have the radiator support out before I could get the trans under the tunnel. I suppose if you have the body raised far enough off the floor it would work as well.but never tried it that way. I also used the LT1 style bellhousing and slave.

    John
     

Share This Page