Rich Schmidt
Veteran Member
I like the green. Don't rag on these little eco boxes,it is because of cars like this that Chevy will be able to keep producing 500hp V-8's
Cataldo said:As much as i feel better in a larger car, its pretty amazing how well the little lunch box's hold up. Wish i had pics but long story short I wrecked a 2010-2011 Chevy Aveo into a '97 ish Civic at 40-45mph
DENALI said:What about the Chevy Cruz eco? They are supposed to get as good mileage as the spark or the sonic.
Aceshigh said:Anyone still feel Compacts are really safe ?? I don't.
It's not MY driving I'm worried about.......it's other people blowing red lights possibly T-boning my car.
Aceshigh said:I agree with Bondo, that car isn't safe IMO at all. I don't care how the NHSTA rates it.
Physically it's too light and large vehicles will destroy it in a major accident.
Never mind the clown car aspect being crushed inside of it like a tuna can.
The Civic was destroyed because you more then likely gave it a good speed SIDE impact. Correct??
Most Crash tests these guys only show you FRONTAL impacts.
You'd probably sh** yourselves if you seen how most any Compact or Subcompact cars fare in a side or rear impact at those speeds VS a larger car, SUV, or pickup. Keep in mind the NHSTA Rated that year Civic as a 5 star for SIDE crash impact.http://car-safety-ratings.findtheda...e-the-safety-ratings-for-the-1997-Honda-Civic
Anyone still feel Compacts are really safe ?? I don't.
It's not MY driving I'm worried about.......it's other people blowing red lights possibly T-boning my car.
FreedomPenguin said:are you sure they don't perform side crash ratings on cars?